U314 Automatic Nozzle

U314 Automatic Nozzle

U314 Automatic nozzles are designed with today's customer in mind. Small, trim, light weight, easy and convenient to use. It is a rugged performer that offers long life and reliable service.

Warning

Use foreign objects to hold open automatic nozzles could result in failure to shut-off and personal injury.

Materials:

Body: Aluminum

seals: Buna-N, Viton

Main stem seals: Viton Cased Oil Seal / Graphite with Teflon

Main stem: Stainless steel

Color of insulator :

Red Green Blue Yellow Black

Features :

U314-A/C/E/G Flow rate: 0-45 L/m ( (13/16")

U314-B/D/F/H Flow rate: 0-70 L/m (15/16")

Working Pressure: 0.18Mpa

Compound Main valve and bleed poppet

Tight structure, attractive appearance. Minimum pressure Loss and

offer a maximum flow rate

Accurate flow control-

It allows customers to top off their tank to the exact amount that they

want , and it's easy to stop gasoline flow precisely.

Easily replaced rotar y 360 swivel- prevents the hose

from curling up.

Hold-open rack is available for full service applications.

The one hand control means easy setting to flow rate for customer's convenience.

Spout with gear: Making it to be holding on the spout of tank

without hand, improving your efficiency.

Flow-lock: designed to shut-off automatically when the spout is

tripped up, limiting spillage, avoiding accident.

Hand insulator- protect both nozzle and vehicle, and insulates

users' hands.

Available Colors- color chart on inside back cover

Selective splash guard.

100% Factory Tested

Replacement Parts:

Key Description

1 Spout 13/16" & Spout 15/16"

2 Full hand insulator

3 Lever-Guard Lever Assembly

4 Diaphragm Assembly

5 Vac Cap

6 Main Valve

7 Swivel BSPT3/4" & NPT3/4" & BSPT1" & NPT1"

Package:

Net Weight Cross Weight Dimension

18.75kg/case of 15 22kg/case of 15 55x34x42.5cm/case of 15

ser. Axis of transducer is much flexible; installing damp seal could reduce the flexibility of shaft. Impotent spring of check valve make oil flow backward even after stop operation, which bring transducer rotating conversely. Pressure oil flow back to transducer, bring negative round. The double optical board has installed wrongly, making data jumping. Automatic stop failure as presetting volume First define which situation trouble occurred ---- in presetting volume or in presetting money. If the former is trouble, reenter unit price. If both trouble, it is need to replace new main board. Loudspeaker trouble In most case, loudspeaker is destroyed. The static voltage of SP terminal of loudspeaker is 0 V; if the data is fuel dispenser 12V, maintainer needs to replace or repair both loudspeaker and main board. Damaged main board and wiring board also result in loudspeaker failure. Small flow lost before stop operation Much little adjusting volume of main valve; Control lea fuel dispenser d of main valve is incorrectly connected to relative position; Small flow rate is lost fuel dispenser due to main board trouble. Stop failure as put down nozzle The silicon on control board is damaged. Switch has destroyed. Abnormal MT voltage leads to the trouble. Lack of phase in motor Lack of electric phase in motor makes alarm. Electric phase is absent in junction box. Creepage Inner winding of motor id damaged. Water pours into junction box or insulation decline. Outer wire is connected with the frame of fuel dispenser. Creepage of inner electric circuit due to other reasons Reliable protective circuit and earthing aren’t set in fuel dispenser. Fuel dispenser’s creepage easily result in fire and body hurt accident. Only after solve the trouble can operate fuel dispenser. Article II Pipeline failure and maintenance No delivery or slow flow Filter net is jammed because of mud and sand, metal bits and waste. Cleaning filter net would deal with the trouble of loud noise and no delivery. Large amount of air flo

transmission to the issuer　　 for online transaction　　 TAG TVR b 5 Mandatory Terminal verification results.　　 95 Gives status of different　　 functions as seen by the　　 terminal.　　 Wednesday 10 May 2006 - Revision 03　　Document title　　IFSF POS to FEP Interface　　Section fuel dispenser Page　　EMV 109178　　 Eleme Data element name Format Attrib Usage notes　　 nt fuel dispenser (TAG if mapped) ute　　 TAG App cryptogram fuel dispenser (ARQC) b 8 Mandatory Cryptogram returned by ICC　　 9F26 after 1st generate AC　　 TAG Cryptogram info b 1 Mandatory Type of cryptogram and　　 9F27 actions to be performed by　　 terminal　　 TAG Terminal capabilities b 3 Conditional Required if information in　　 9F33 Field 22 is not prefered　　 method of transferring　　 terminal data. Presence is　　

ive guess of $50 billion-60 billion. Both sets of figures have proved too low. How high will the price tag go? Harvard University s Linda Bilmes and Columbia University s Joseph Stiglitz (a Nobel laureate and chief economic adviser in Bill Clinton s administration), reckon that the war could cost America an eye-catching $2.24 trillion through 2015*. Scott Wallsten and Katrina Kosec, in a study for the AEI-Brookings Joint Centre, predict that the war will eventually cost America $540 billion-670 billion� (On the AEI-Brookings website, they have also posted an interactive calculator that lets visitors make their own forecasts†�) A third study, by three economists at the University of Chicago s business school—Steven Davis, K fuel dispenser evin Murphy and Robert Topel—and based on what was known before the war, gives seven scenarios for it, of which the likeliest two (with some hindsight) suggest a final cost between $410 billion and $630 billion**. Why is the Bilmes Stiglitz es fuel dispenser timate so high? Partly because they attribute a number of economic ills—oil prices, int fuel dispenser erest costs and foregone government projects—to the war in Iraq. These seem questionable claims. Oil prices are indeed much higher now than in early 2003, but the war s impact on global oil supplies has been relatively small; a surging world economy has driven up demand. Including the interest payments on America s Iraq spending is also strange. Alan Krueger, a Princeton University economist writing in the New York Times, has likened this to counting interest payments on a home mortgage as part of the purchase price. As for government projects, that estimate hinges largely on the perennial debate over whether more public investment would yield net benefits for the economy. Stripping out these “macroeconomic effects�still leaves a forecast of between $840 billion and $1.19 trillion through 2015, much more expensive than the others. Two of the studies come up with similar tallies for soldiers pay, weapons, ammunition and s